Rome Total War low fps Anonymous 12/19/17 (Tue) 19:06:38 7b2de1 No. 14011449 gtx 1080 Ti i7 5960X 32768MB RAM Rome Total War runs below 60 fps. ctrl+f Rome no clear Rome Total War thread. Mods delet dis if wrong, untill then pls respond with solutions. The.dll fix doesn't work for me. Anonymous 12/19/17. Im running the game at 1920x1200 max settings with 4xAA and16xAF im running the version 1.5 my specs are in my sig and in the big battles i get bad lag with less then 20fps when zoomed out.
Based on the benchmarks for Total War Rome 2 in the link below, the game is actually a bit demanding if you want 30 FPS with the lowest settings. Note that results are average FPS, not minimum FPS. So if 'solid 30 FPS' means a minimum of 30 FPS, then I recommend looking at dedicated graphic chips / integrated graphics cores that can provide an average of 40 FPS just to be sure. In short, a £100-150 laptop will not be good enough to play the game. It will be difficult to even find a used laptop within the range that is capable of playing the game with 'solid 30 FPS'.
You need a laptop with either an Intel HD 4400, Radeon HD 8550G or the Radeon HD 7610M. Ignore the Radeon HD 8470D because that is only found in desktop AMD APUs.The Intel HD 4400 are found in 4th generation 'Haswell' Intel Core i3 / i5 /i7 CPUs like the i5-4200u (the 4xxx means 4th gen). It is also found in the less expensive i3-4030u CPU, but benchmarks are either based on an i5 or i7 CPU.
The i3 series have lower clockspeed, which means results would be less than 31.8 FPS using the lowest settings @ 1024x768 resolution.The Radeon HD 8550G is in the AMD A8-5550M APU which was released back in 2013.The Radeon HD 7610M is an old dedicated graphics chip released back in 2011 so you can probably do a search on it to find used laptops with that dedicated GPU.
For the original German article, see. GraphicsWe tested the 'original version' of Total War: Rome II and were left with mixed feelings. The new Total War narrative is one of the most appealing strategy games we've ever seen, but on closer look there certainly are a lot of bugs.While Rome II makes a striking impression at low zoom levels, close-ups definitely reveal flaws. Experienced gamers are bound to criticize not only the weak textures and frequent clipping errors, but even the periodically low polygon count.It should be noted, however, that such high zoom-levels aren't all that common in the strategy genre, so it's not quite fair to expect the graphics quality typical of action or shooter games. The developers deserve to be praised for the comprehensive settings options.
Let's begin with the basic graphics menu, which offers a variety of resolutions and a whole six presets. You can control the individual settings in the advanced options. Here we have about 20 menu items that span from 'A' as in 'anti-aliasing' to 'W' as in 'water'.
Depending on the level and graphics card, the game uses the Shader Model 3, 4 or 5. Although Intel's and chips have a compatible feature set, we could only use the 'low' and 'medium' quality settings.It's also a shame that Creative Assembly only built-in an anti-aliasing mode and didn't think the presets through as far as they should have (the highest setting only activates 2x AF, which takes hardly any computational power).
Like we've seen with the series, the game's graphics quality degrades very quickly as you select lower settings. At low or medium details, Rome II looks quite ugly (muddy textures, missing vegetation, reduced object count, etc.).Even on the 'High Quality' setting, epic battles don't quite reach their full potential.
Only at high or ultrahigh details can we speak of first-class visuals. No current notebook graphics card can handle the top level, 'Extreme'. According to the developers, several patches should be released in the next few weeks. The patches are supposed to help with the game's performance, but whether the developers' intentions come to fruition remains to be seen. In general, we can say that the frame-rates fluctuate enormously. Even high-end GPUs' frame-rates plummet in some situations, despite the fact that the average display refresh rates suggest that the game should run fluidly enough for normal gameplay (see the screenshots below the Verdict section).We also frequently had to fight with incorrectly loaded textures. Despite the fact that we selected the correct settings and installed the current drivers, on many systems the resolution of the character models was too low.
As a result, some graphics cards ranked above models that are actually stronger (for example, the ranked above the ).Additionally, often textures 'pop up' relatively late, which makes for a somewhat unstable image. All in all, the graphics don't seem to be fully developed. As was true of, the number of errors a gamer will encounter is (still) very high. Due to the fluctuating performance, it's not easy to reach a universally applicable conclusion about the game's system requirements. Even users of high-end systems have complained of jerky graphics.
If you only take the benchmark into account and observe the recorded performance drops, you'll need an average of at least 40 fps to run the game fluidly.On the basis of this assertion, for low details and 1024x768 pixels, we recommend an entry-level chip on the level of the. You'll need at least a mid-range GPU, like the, to play the game at normal details and 1366x768 pixels. For the 'High' preset, depending on the resolution, you'll require a model from the upper middle class or lower high-end sector (from the up).As previously mentioned our highest quality setting, comprised of the combination of 1920x1080 pixels and the 'Extreme' preset, overtaxes every notebook graphics card on the market. Even mighty desktop GPUs, like the or the, don't manage more than 40 fps (on average) in the benchmark. If you're willing to settle for the ultra setting, which runs about 40% more fluidly, for 1920x1080 pixels you'll need at least a.A look at the reveals that the strategy title can also be limited by the CPU. It's hard to reach more than 40 fps with the. Speaking of AMD: While the ran suspiciously slowly at moderate settings (beneath the level of the ), we couldn't even test the, because Rome II only recognized the integrated GPU.
This problem must be tied to the game, the driver (we tried version 13.4 and 13.8 Beta2) or the Enduro graphics switching. (-). Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value /. Approximate positionLegend5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates.
Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fpsMay Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fpsMay Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game.
Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. # initialized values +0.0008s.
Rome Total War Low Fps Windows 10 Download
0.0008s#1 cached gamecheck data found for bench uid 236 +0.0041s. 0.0049s#2 Cache table found, checking fields. 0.0055s#3 Cache table for values found, checking fields.
0.0083s#4 Cache table found with all needed fields in it! 0.0083s#5 Loaded cached specs data from 06 Jun 2019 20:35:55 = 92.7h +0.0422s. 0.0505s#6 found 3676 cached benchmark values +0.0362s. 0.0867s#7 Loaded cached benchmark data txnbc2gpugamecachevalues +0.0092s. 0.0959s#8 Created sortOrder for cached benchmark data +0s.
0.0959s#9 added benchmark program data +0.001s. 0.0969s#10 did output the form +0.0002s.
0.0971s#11 did compose the header +0.0015s. 0.0986s#12 did output the list +0.0053s. 0.1039s gpulist v4.4.